Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ValueCore
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-16 17:33:26
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (38)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Even after you think you bought a car, dealerships can 'yo-yo' you and take it back
- Shoppers Say This Tula Eye Cream Is “Magic in a Bottle”: Don’t Miss This 2 for the Price of 1 Deal
- Hollywood goes on strike as actors join writers on picket lines, citing existential threat to profession
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- The ice cream conspiracy
- The Beigie Awards: All about inventory
- Hollywood goes on strike as actors join writers on picket lines, citing existential threat to profession
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- U.S. employers added 517,000 jobs last month. It's a surprisingly strong number
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Inside Clean Energy: Rooftop Solar Could Lose Big in Federal Regulatory Case
- In a Summer of Deadly Deluges, New Research Shows How Global Warming Fuels Flooding
- Kylie Jenner Is Not OK After This Cute Exchange With Son Aire
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Need a new credit card? It can take almost two months to get a replacement
- Latest on Ukraine: EU just banned Russian diesel and other oil products (Feb. 6)
- Panama Enacts a Rights of Nature Law, Guaranteeing the Natural World’s ‘Right to Exist, Persist and Regenerate’
Recommendation
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Reckoning With The NFL's Rooney Rule
Amazon Shoppers Swear By This $22 Pack of Boy Shorts to Prevent Chafing While Wearing Dresses
A new bill in Florida would give the governor control of Disney's governing district
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
John Goodman Reveals 200 Pound Weight Loss Transformation
This Jennifer Aniston Editing Error From a 2003 Friends Episode Will Have You Doing a Double Take
The Indicator Quiz: Inflation